As the people of the Kurdistan Region prepare to head to the polls on September 25, 2017, in a historical referendum on Kurdistan's independence, we compare the economies of Iraq with other nations and ask, “What economic structure would a sovereign Kurdistan take?"Read More
This is not a political opinion, but an economic point of view. Some people in the Kurdistan Region oppose the proposed referendum for independence just because it's adopted by a certain party, while others argue that this isn't the right time for a serious step like that as the Region is suffering from severe economic crisis.Read More
Kaufmann et al (1999) defined "governance as the traditions and institutions that determine how authority is exercised in a country." Based on available literature including thoughts of neo-institutional scholars including, Douglass North and MancurOlsan, a positive relationship between the quality of institutions, governance structures, and economic growth is found.Read More
Due to a traditional mistrust of saving money at banks and a banking system still largely in its infancy, most people in KRG prefer to keep their money at home. Despite the involvement of foreign branches and the continued growth of local banks, the banking sector of Kurdistan requires further modernization and development. To date, the Kurdistan Region consists of two state-owned central banks, 14 state-owned regional banks and 30 privately owned banks with branches spread across the Region.
Since early this year the Kurdistan Region has been facing the most serious banking crisis since 1991, as a result of continuing differences between the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) and the federal Government over budget allocations and oil revenues.
The dispute started in 2012 when the KRG started building its own pipeline to transport oil and natural gas from the Kurdistan region to Turkey, as a first step towards economic independence from the federal government. But making this step is not easy without the strong banking sector which is essential to a successful economy.
The recent oil dispute revealed KRG’s financial vulnerability, when the KRG banks’ lack of liquidity resulted in local Government failing to pay employees’ salaries. Whether this dispute is deemed an economic, political or even constitutional crisis between the KRG and the federal Government, there are still some questions which remain to be answered about the failure of the Kurdistan Regional banking system to provide the liquidity necessary to avoid this crisis. The current banking crisis in Kurdistan was more a political than an economic crisis; there were still mechanisms that the KRG could have developed which would have led to a more solid banking sector enjoying stronger financial capabilities.
After all, a strong banking system will help the Government to measure and quantify economic activity, as well as to support private sector growth by providing access to finance. However, the high economic growth in the Kurdistan region during the last 10 years has not been reflected in development of infrastructure, especially in the banking sector. As can be seen, there are more than 70 private banks in the Kurdistan region, however they have not engaged in market activities in an effective and efficient manner.
While banks in the developed countries are financing commercial projects and giving loans to Governments to finance large infrastructure projects, in the Kurdistan Region the banking sector plays a limited role in business transactions and is isolated from other activities such as loans and savings. Due to past decades of unstable politics and insecurity in the Kurdistan region, Kurdish people have a strong preference for holding cash at home. This has created and inherent lack of trust in the banking system, as the Kurdistan people still do not believe in banks, being more interested in trust than in interest rates.
As a consequence of this long time habit and the lack of a banking culture, the mission of banks to date in the Kurdistan region is limited to the role of mediator between the government and the employees. It is also important to mention that although the Kurdistan region has pursued its own successful policies for oil and investment over the last decade, for banking purposes it remains close to Baghdad. This is because the Iraqi constitution did not grant fiscal and financial regulatory independence to the Kurdistan region central bank.
As a consequence, the Iraqi federal Government controls KRG financial policy, and thus the KRG has no direct authority over the flow of money into the market. This absence of a private entity is the reason for the lack of coordination between Kurdistan region banks and world class financial institutions. In order to overcome this crisis and prevent future financial problems with the federal government, the KRG needs to adopt prudent fiscal policies and to make major reforms in the banking sector, namely: